Police must
inform residents of their rights before entering their home if they are invited
in after requesting permission, preventing the circumvention a warrant
requirement.
State v. Budd, 2016 BL 159792,
Wash., No. 91529-6, 5/19/16.
The Supreme Court of Washington reaffirms an
earlier state decision that police conducting a “knock and talk” must give
residents a warning of their rights to refuse entry or the scope of searches
conducted by police before, not after, entering the home to establish the consent
for entry. The court emphasized the necessity of the warnings because police
knocking on your door is “inherently coercive,” even without a warrant. The
ruling extended the requirement to not only the immediate area around the
doorstep of a home, but also to the yard as well.
Washington is one of the few jurisdictions in
the country that require this type of warning. Utah, however, does not have similar
requirements to provide a warning to establish consent when performing a “knock
and talk” search. To the contrary, the lack of knowledge of the ability to
refuse entry into a home by an officer does not establish involuntary entry. See State v. Fretheim, 358 P.3d 336
(2015 UT App 197).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.