Striking potential jurors based
on race is unconstitutional, reaffirming earlier Supreme Court ruling
preventing the use of race in jury selection
Foster v. Chatman, 2016 BL 162869,
U.S., No. 14-8349, reversed and remanded 5/23/16
The United
States Supreme Court ruled that peremptory jury strikes motivated by race are
impermissible, reaffirming the court’s 1986 ruling in Batson v. Kentucky.
Annotations along names of black jurors, such as “Definite No” and “No.
No Black Church” were “as clear as a Batson
violation as a court is ever going to see.”
The Supreme
Court focused on two jurors who were stricken. The state offered 11 neutral,
non-race based reasons for striking the first juror and eight reasons for the
second juror. The Court, however, found the reasons unconvincing and merely suggested
pretext. In the opinion, the Court notes the “focus on race in the
prosecution’s file plainly demonstrates a concerted effort to keep black
prospective jurors off the jury.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.