Florida's "hybrid" jury advisory sentencing scheme, which did not require unanimity, was struck down under the Sixth Amendment.
Hurst v. Florida, U.S. No. 14-7505, decided on 1/12/16
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a Florida capital punishment sentencing scheme that involved juries giving advisory verdicts which did not need to be unanimous, but took into account aggravating factors and punishment. Ultimately, the juries were told, the judges had the final decision for what punishment would be imposed.
The Court stated that "[t]he Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge, to find each fact necessary to impose a sentence of death. A jury's recommendation is not enough."
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-7505_5ie6.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.